Wearable Computing, by its very
nature, blurs the boundary between
"thinking" and "computing".  Likewise,
the boundary between "remembering"
and "recording" will also disappear.

Thus what will it mean to patent an
algorithm, or copyright some knowledge?

Will it mean that...
  Memorization is copying; copyring is theft!
  Seeing is recording; recording is theft!
  Learning is downloading; downloading is theft!
or that the learner must pay a license fee to the
teacher, each time he or she thinks of some
copyrighted knowledge?

As we evolve from "Wearables" to
"Implantables.com" will we witness the birth of
the one seat license or the floating license?
Will the license manager allow more than fifty
people to think the same thoughts at the same
time, if all we have is a 50 seat license?  Will
free thinking be considered circumvention of
the Uniform SEAT Association's UseatA?

Laws or contracts against reverse
engineering are laws and contracts
against science, and against the very
process of thought itself.